While streaming does provide many of the same channel options as cable packages, there are a few key areas where its coverage and capabilities are lacking, and local channel inclusion is at the top of that “what’s missing?” list for many streaming services – particularly for the many millions of subscribers who don’t live within a major metropolitan area. To get more news about 39bet-sòng bạc trực tuyến-cá độ bóng đá-mua vé số-đặt cược onl-máy đua ngựa, you can visit official website.
If you’ve been a cable subscriber for many years, chances are you have taken ready and reliable access to local programming for granted. Whether you’re a dedicated viewer of soap operas and Jeopardy, or most often turn to local channels to keep up with news and sports, these are the networks most of us consider to be the foundation of our television options. With so many of us relying on them for all manner of information and entertainment, why do so many streaming services leave them off the table? Simply put – there is a lot going on behind-the-scenes that makes delivery of major broadcast networks difficult for non-cable providers.
Because so much of our news and sports programming is localized, there is no true blanket option for streaming services to get the programming designed for our market to our television quickly and affordably. Cable providers have already worked out the individualized negotiations, contracts and agreements, following often complex FCC rules.
First, the networks themselves work out agreements with affiliate stations, who then partner with cable providers to serve those local signals, and in turn local news, live event programming, and live sports, to their subscribers.
For streaming services to undertake these negotiations can take a significant amount of time and resources, with many only able to offer local channels in a small number of markets, and/or only able to offer live streams from one, two, or three of the “Big Four” networks.